Current:Home > NewsHouse to vote on GOP's new standalone Israel aid bill -Aspire Money Growth
House to vote on GOP's new standalone Israel aid bill
Charles H. Sloan View
Date:2025-04-06 15:53:17
Washington — The House is expected to vote Tuesday on a new standalone bill to provide billions of dollars of aid to Israel, complicating efforts in the Senate to rally support for a bipartisan national security bill that House GOP leaders oppose.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, announced the legislation that would send $17.6 billion to Israel in a letter to colleagues on Saturday, one day before the unveiling of the Senate's broader security package. Johnson is bringing the bill to the floor using a maneuver that requires the support of two-thirds of the House to pass, a high bar given opposition from both the right and the left.
The Senate package, which resulted from months of negotiations, would overhaul U.S. border policy and includes funding for Ukraine in its war against Russia, as well as military aid for Israel and humanitarian assistance for Palestinians in Gaza. The bill came as a response to Republican demands for border security funding in exchange for more Ukraine aid.
But Johnson and other House Republican leaders quickly pronounced the bill dead on arrival in the lower chamber, while reviving a GOP effort to send emergency aid to Israel via a standalone measure.
"Their leadership is aware that by failing to include the House in their negotiations, they have eliminated the ability for swift consideration of any legislation," Johnson wrote over the weekend, adding that "the House will have to work its will on these issues and our priorities will need to be addressed."
House Republicans sought to provide $14.3 billion in aid to Israel last year that would have been paid for by cutting the same amount in funding to the IRS. The legislation never received a vote in the Senate because of Democratic opposition to the IRS cuts.
Johnson argued that Democrats should not oppose the new bill given that it does not include the funding offsets.
"During debate in the House and in numerous subsequent statements, Democrats made clear that their primary objection to the original House bill was with its offsets," Johnson wrote. "The Senate will no longer have excuses, however misguided, against swift passage of this critical support for our ally."
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, urged his colleagues to vote against the bill on Tuesday, calling it "a nakedly obvious and cynical attempt by MAGA extremists to undermine the possibility of a comprehensive, bipartisan funding package."
But at least two Democrats said they'll vote for it.
"We must stand with our ally Israel, get all of the hostages home, defeat Hamas, provide crucial humanitarian aid to innocent Palestinians, and work toward an enduring peace," Reps. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey and Jared Moskowitz of Florida said in a statement Monday.
But Johnson's decision to remove the cuts to the IRS prompted opposition from the conservative House Freedom Caucus, which accused the speaker of "surrendering to perceived pressure to move an even larger but now unpaid for Israel aid package."
"Conservatives should not be forced to choose between borrowing money to support our special friend Israel or honoring our commitment to end unpaid supplemental spending that exacerbate our nation's unsustainable fiscal crisis and further risks our ability to respond to future crises," the group said in a statement on Sunday.
President Biden would veto the standalone Israel bill if it passes both chambers of Congress, the White House said Monday.
Scott MacFarlane and Nikole Killion contributed reporting.
- In:
- Israel
- United States House of Representatives
Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter at cbsnews.com and is based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked for the Washington Examiner and The Hill, and was a member of the 2022 Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellowship with the National Press Foundation.
TwitterveryGood! (9)
Related
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Abortion isn’t on the ballot in California, but state candidates can’t stop talking about it
- Opinion: No. 1 Texas football here to devour Georgia, even if Kirby Smart anointed king
- Lawyers for Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs ask judge to release identities of his accusers
- Average rate on 30
- Zendaya's Stylist Law Roach Reacts to 2025 Met Gala Theme
- Victoria's Secret Fashion Show: Tyra Banks Returns to Runway Nearly 20 Years After Modeling Retirement
- Off-duty Detroit officer fatally shot after wounding 2 fellow officers, chief says
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- Lawyers for Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs ask judge to release identities of his accusers
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Mike Tyson brought in three familiar sparring partners in preparation for Jake Paul
- Justice Department to monitor voting in Ohio county after sheriff’s comment about Harris supporters
- ALDI's Thanksgiving dinner bundle is its lowest price in 5 years: How families can eat for less
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Cozy Up With Sydney Sweeney & HEYDUDE's All-New, Super Soft Slipper Collection
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword, A Sight to Behold (Freestyle)
- Ryan Murphy Reveals Taylor Swift Easter Egg in Travis Kelce Grostequerie Scene
Recommendation
Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
Some coaches may get surprise if they reach College Football Playoff. And not a good one.
The Daily Money: A rosy holiday forecast
Isan Elba Shares Dad Idris Elba's Best Advice for Hollywood
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
WNBA Finals Game 3 winners, losers: Liberty on brink of first title
Mega Millions winning numbers for October 15 drawing: Did anyone win $169 million jackpot?
'We Live in Time' review: A starry cancer drama that should have been weepier