Current:Home > FinanceWest Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies -Aspire Money Growth
West Virginia lawmakers reject bill to expand DNA database to people charged with certain felonies
View
Date:2025-04-15 21:20:11
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — West Virginia lawmakers on Thursday soundly rejected a bill that would have expanded a law enforcement database to include collecting DNA samples from people arrested for certain felonies.
Some legislators cited privacy concerns during a lengthy debate before the 66-30 vote by the Republican-dominated House of Delegates. Three members were absent.
“This is just another step away from our liberties,” said Republican Del. Rolland Jennings of Preston County.
Current state law requires a DNA sample to be taken from anyone convicted of a felony and certain misdemeanors. The bill would have expanded the law to obtain DNA through cheek swabs from adults arrested on felony charges of violence against someone, a burglary or a case involving a minor. The samples would be sent to a state crime lab and the results stored in an FBI database.
“If you don’t want your DNA taken, don’t do a heinous crime,” said Republican Del. Scot Heckert, a bill supporter.
But some Democrats were concerned about the bill’s potential infringement on Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
“This bill is extremely broad,” Ohio County Democrat Shawn Fluharty said. “It’s dangerous territory to put people in a DNA database simply because they’ve been arrested just for probable cause and accused of a crime.”
Mason County Republican Jonathan Pinson, a bill supporter, said it was no more of a constitutional concern than collecting fingerprints from suspects. Pinson said lawmakers should be more concerned about helping crime victims whose cases remain unsolved “because we don’t know where to look” for evidence.
The bill also contained steps to expunge someone’s DNA records from the database if they were cleared of the felony charges.
Prior to the vote, the House twice rejected bids to halt debate on the bill.
veryGood! (947)
Related
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- North Carolina Hurricanes Linked to Increases in Gastrointestinal Illnesses in Marginalized Communities
- Can forcing people to save cool inflation?
- Who Olivia Rodrigo Fans Think Her New Song Vampire Is Really About
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Fox News settles blockbuster defamation lawsuit with Dominion Voting Systems
- Inside Clean Energy: Here Are 5 States that Took Leaps on Clean Energy Policy in 2021
- When your boss is an algorithm
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Inside Clean Energy: Here’s What the 2021 Elections Tell Us About the Politics of Clean Energy
Ranking
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- How One Native American Tribe is Battling for Control Over Flaring
- Ecuador’s High Court Rules That Wild Animals Have Legal Rights
- Inside Clean Energy: Here’s What the 2021 Elections Tell Us About the Politics of Clean Energy
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Bed Bath & the great Beyond: How the home goods giant went bankrupt
- North Carolina’s Bet on Biomass Energy Is Faltering, With Energy Targets Unmet and Concerns About Environmental Justice
- Little Big Town to Host First-Ever People's Choice Country Awards
Recommendation
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
DeSantis seeks to control Disney with state oversight powers
Dollar v. world / Taylor Swift v. FTX / Fox v. Dominion
Plans To Dig the Biggest Lithium Mine in the US Face Mounting Opposition
Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
Elizabeth Holmes' prison sentence has been delayed
What went wrong at Silicon Valley Bank? The Fed is set to release a postmortem report
Global Warming Drove a Deadly Burst of Indian Ocean Tropical Storms