Current:Home > StocksArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -Aspire Money Growth
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-13 21:05:57
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Why TikTokers Francesca Farago and Jesse Sullivan Want to Be Trailblazers in the LGBTQ+ Community
- Jedidiah Duggar and Wife Katey Welcome Baby No. 2
- What is a Uyghur?: Presidential candidate Francis Suarez botches question about China
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- An Unlikely Alliance of Farm and Environmental Groups Takes on Climate Change
- 50% Rise in Renewable Energy Needed to Meet Ambitious State Standards
- 7 die at Panama City Beach this month; sheriff beyond frustrated by ignored warnings
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Tom Sandoval, Raquel Leviss Can't Believe They're Labeled Pathological Liars After Affair
Ranking
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Delta plane makes smooth emergency landing in Charlotte
- Is Trump Holding Congestion Pricing in New York City Hostage?
- California and Colorado Fires May Be Part of a Climate-Driven Transformation of Wildfires Around the Globe
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Suniva, Seeking Tariffs on Foreign Solar Panels, Faces Tough Questions from ITC
- California’s New Cap-and-Trade Plan Heads for a Vote—with Tradeoffs
- Major Pipeline Delays Leave Canada’s Tar Sands Struggling
Recommendation
Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
Family Feud Contestant Timothy Bliefnick Found Guilty of Murdering Wife Rebecca
Weeping and Anger over a Lost Shrimping Season, Perhaps a Way of Life
Yusef Salaam, exonerated member of Central Park Five, declares victory in New York City Council race
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
United Nations Chief Warns of a ‘Moment of Truth for People and Planet’
Pregnant Naomi Osaka Reveals the Sex of Her First Baby
Study: Minority Communities Suffer Most If California Suspends AB 32